As a Hardcore Capitalist, But Universal Medicare Is the Best Hope for US Healthcare
Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.
Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.
The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive
Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.
Now the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.
When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?
When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this can't continue.
I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.
How National Health Insurance Would Work
Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.
Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of clients who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.
Implementation in the US
For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.
Benefits for Small Businesses
Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).
It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.
Free-Market Viewpoint
I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.
Considering Challenges
Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.
Time for Honest Assessment
As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.