🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has consistently shown his desire to see opponents probed, exerting influence on the DOJ to charge ex FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone further, it's killing our standing and trustworthiness," the president stated last month in a Truth Social post.

"I was impeached twice, and charged me (five times!)" he said, referencing the four criminal cases he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Both have subsequently been charged, in cases that numerous specialists have said seem to be politically motivated and challenging to win in legal proceedings.

But the most recent allegations against a presidential opponent, former security advisor John Bolton, stand apart, legal experts and ex-prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, comparing Bolton's charges to James' is like comparing two different things," said Mark Lesko, a ex acting US attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of Bolton's Case

Bolton has been formally charged on federal charges pertaining to the supposed mishandling of sensitive materials. Since departing the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a vocal presidential opponent, even to call him "stunningly uninformed" and unsuitable for office in his book.

Specialists contend that while there may be political reasons to go after Bolton, the procedures used to obtain an charge and the proof compiled against him indicate a possibly stronger legal argument than the Justice Department brought against Comey.

"These actions that's being alleged is simultaneously more serious and seems to have taken place over a considerable duration," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's security advisor, and after his 2019 White House departure, prosecutors claimed that Bolton placed the nation at risk by wrongfully retaining and transmitting classified information to relatives using insecure means, including AOL. Some of the documents were labeled highly classified.

The indictment states that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's system where documents were kept and transmitted an seeming warning to cause "the largest scandal since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a court appearance on recently to eighteen distinct counts of mishandling sensitive materials.

Political Motivation or a Substantial Case?

The timing of his indictment - arriving on the heels of charges against Comey - has renewed concerns about external influence on the justice system.

Trump once suggested Bolton belonged in jail, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his role, wrote a publication about his time in the Trump government that was highly critical of the president.

"There's no question that the schedule of this indictment, when combined with others, has raised doubts about the strength of these allegations, and why these counts are being brought now," said Jamil Jaffer, creator and director of the National Security Institute.

Nevertheless, he added, "if the Justice Department is able to prove the allegations alleged and demonstrate the information is properly designated, his conduct may very well have violated the law".

Charging such a high-ranking figure for mishandling classified documents is "uncommon" but not unprecedented, said Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that concern classified information present difficulties to prosecute, but they can and are filed against equally junior and high-level officials, from occasionally," she said.

Similarities to Investigations into Former President and President

Trump likewise encountered allegations of wrongfully keeping classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and hindering their recovery, but that case was eventually dismissed by a court official and negated by his return as leader.

A special counsel additionally found that ex-President Joe Biden wrongfully maintained classified documents from his period as second-in-command, but did not criminally charge him.

Bolton's situation shares characteristics to Trump's classified documents matters, said Mr Lesko, who previously held a senior security position at the Justice Department.

Rigorous procedures regulate the handling of sensitive materials. To win a guilty verdict, the prosecution must demonstrate that Bolton knew the information he was transmitting was classified, and he had to intentionally transfer it to someone without authorization to obtain it.

"Due to the sensitive character of the information at issue in this matter, we lack a lot of particulars about why the government contends things like the personal notes and the other information he communicated by electronic message, and the reason there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Conventional Legal Action

The process by which the DOJ brought this legal action will be under scrutiny, following Trump openly expressed his wish to see his critics prosecuted and several of those indictments materialized.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's situation, authorities appear to have adhered to standard procedure.

"The Bolton case and eventually the indictment appeared to have observed the regular process including the regulations and norms within the DOJ," he said.

In contrast to Comey's short, two-page indictment, Bolton's was a more "traditional" filing that "explicitly sets forth the particulars concerning the circumstances and situation here," Mr Lesko said.

"It appears reasonably consistent with a series of precedents... where public servants mishandled and shared classified material."